New report · VizagCan India's new AI coast deliver GW-scale compute on time?
Get the free report
AISIGINT Audit · Named-site diligence

Most announced AI datacenter capacity will not energize on time.

AISIGINT Audit separates announced capacity from a credible delivery path. Our agents test a named site across grid, land, water, permits, connectivity, workload fit, and timing; human experts validate the findings before they reach your team.

Explore the public corridor report, then bring us a named site, parcel, grid path, water route, or sponsor claim for an Audit.

Conceptual aerial rendering of a proposed datacenter campus layout within a parcel boundary
Traditional capacity mostly energizes on time. AI capacity does not.
Trusted by

Tier 1 datacenter operators, infrastructure investment funds, and advisory firms.

Why now

Land, grid, and evidence get spoken for in that order.

Land moves first.

2027 AI campus parcels are being optioned now.

Grid queue hardens.

Usable 400 kV injection nodes are spoken for before a corridor is obvious.

Evidence compounds.

Sites that look comparable today price differently once the evidence is in.

The platform

AI agents read at scale. Human experts validate ground truth.

Eight specialist AI agents read primary sources, satellite imagery, and 1.4M India geospatial features. Human infrastructure experts sign off before any output ships.

8
AI research agents
12
Step diligence pipeline
200+
Tiered primary sources per audit
1.4M+
India geospatial features
AI + Human

AI alone misses ground truth. Humans alone cannot keep up with the cadence AI capacity now demands. AISIGINT runs both.

What AI agents do

Speed and scale.

  • Read primary sources, satellite imagery, and 1.4M+ geospatial features
  • Cross-reference across eight infrastructure domains
  • Cross-check site claims against current source evidence
  • Surface conflicts for human review
What human experts do

Ground truth and judgment.

  • Validate the AI read against ground reality
  • Resolve conflicting signals with domain judgment
  • Apply context AI cannot infer: counterparty, regulatory posture, build feasibility
  • Sign off before any output ships
The eight AI agents

Each AI agent owns a domain. Human experts validate the read.

For each Audit, agents read filings, satellite imagery, utility records, transmission data, regulatory orders, and tenders. Human experts review the resulting named-site assessment.

Site Resolution

Coordinates, parcel identity, boundary confidence, site context.

Permits & Zoning

Zoning, land use, environmental clearance, permit gates.

Power & Grid

Substations, voltage gaps, grid queue, transmission planning, line tap and loop-in feasibility, behind-the-meter, energization.

Equipment

Transformers, switchgear, procurement, chip-generation timing.

Policy

Regulatory filings, grid access, tariff orders.

Connectivity

Carrier-neutral facilities, IXs, cable landings.

Power Cost

Tariffs, DISCOM context, procurement, availability.

Water & Risk

Water, flood, drainage, industrial adjacency, terrain.

Geospatial depth

Every named site sits within a wider infrastructure map.

16k+
Substations
40k+
Power lines
559k+
Water assets
390k+
Roads
83k+
Rail
26k+
Hazard features
Who uses it

The same evidence base, read five ways.

Investor

Defensible, confidence-banded evidence for the IC on the named-site decision.

Operator

Test what a specific site can support, with grid-path and time-to-power assumptions made explicit.

Lender

Independent verification for the credit file, every claim ranked by source tier and traceable to its primary source.

Developer

Identify the validation work a named site needs before making a capacity or schedule commitment.

Advisor

Named-site evidence you can put in front of a client, with an evidence chain you can attribute or white-label.

How Audit works

One Audit. A clearer decision.

From the first site question to a committee-ready decision, Audit keeps the evidence and its limits visible at every stage.

01
Scope

Define

What must this site support?

Start with a named site, target IT load, workload mix, and intended power pathway. Set the decision and the evidence standard before the review begins.

Audit
02
Investigate

Verify

Which claims survive scrutiny?

Test grid access, permits, land, water, connectivity, campus fit, and delivery timing against cited evidence. Separate confirmed facts from open validation items.

Audit
03
Deliver

Decide

What can the committee rely on?

Receive an evidence-linked decision signal, a feasible path to validate, and the critical questions for investment, lending, or board review.

Audit
Audit · Scope

Ground the decision in a named site.

We tailor the Audit to the site, capacity target, power pathway, and investment question you need answered.

  • Parcel and campus fit against your target IT load and workload mix
  • Grid, water, land, permits, connectivity, and delivery-path checks
  • Scope and turnaround aligned to your decision date
Audit · Deliverable

An evidence-linked answer for the decision.

The Audit makes supported findings, material uncertainties, and the feasible path to validate clear to your investment, lending, or operating team.

  • Decision signal. A named-site GO, CAUTION, or NO-GO with cited rationale and explicit validation boundaries.
  • Feasible path. Phase, power, land, and commercial assumptions to test before capital commitment.

Test the site before the commitment.